THE
IMPURE FORCE by Aleksej Orleanski |
-1-
The article, in this form, couldn't have been written without the assistance of Pauline Groot, a friend of us, who has done a great job in translating most part of the descriptions from Russian to Dutch. They give an insight into the way in which the artist has read these tales and what the depicted characters, animals or objects mean within this context.
She has also translated part of the
following review of the deck in an article
"Netsjistaja sila on playing cards", that was written by Ju. B.
Demidenko from St. Petersburg in 1995.
"You may
believe in them or not, phantoms, spirits, wood-ghosts; you may see them as
agents from another world or as dumb superstition of our ancestors. But one
thing is sure, a whole layer of national culture is connected with the evil
spirits and un-humans. The impure force is the deepest layer of the Slavonic
mythology from pre-Christian, heathen times. In some cases the believe in those
forces has been kept alive until today.
The arts and literature became the
willful
sources of the artist Aleksej Orleanski, who had taken it upon him to make the
most multi-farious evil spirits the heroes of his deck of cards. The use
of the Explanatory Dictionary of V.I. Dal and of the Russian Folktales by A.N.
Afanasjev turned out to be very important to him. Here he found the most
important and interesting knowledge about evil spirits, that he merely had to
transfer into clear images of card figures, that will stick in your
memory."
We know little to nothing about Aleksej Orleanski as an artist, but his drawings for this deck are subtle, both in lines as in colouring, and full of symbols from the East Slavonic mythology. It is clear that he has studied the subject carefully before he started the work on this deck.
|
|
||
|
|
According to the box this deck has been
published in
1998 by Format from Rybinsk, Russia.
But
the
date of the above review, together with the copyright date of the designs (1994), puts a
small question mark to 1998 as the first publication date, that is given on the
WWPCM site. How
can one review a deck, if it isn't even printed yet? But maybe the artist had made
the final drawings for the cards and were those reviewed, before a deck was actually
published.
|
|
|||
|
An encounter with her leads to trouble: at the best an accident, a loss of possessions, illness, the loss of a hand, arm, leg or foot, in the worst case to the downfall of a man.
Years after the
first publication of the deck, a set of postcards was released by the artist
himself in 2003, showing all the cards from the deck, in pairs
or threesomes. On the back of the postcards short descriptions were given in Russian.
The text of the review above can be found on the backside of one of the postcards
too. |
|
|
||
|
|
The Field-ghost is also referred to as a formless figure that reminds more of a haystack, a confluence with crops and grass in the field.
The publication of the postcards was a personal enterprise by the artist, just like the second edition of the deck in 2004, in limited number of 1053 decks.
|
|
|||
|
The black rooster in the drawing of Bannik, the Jack of Diamonds, refers to an old ritual that may still be in use in some parts of Slavonia: to suit the Bath-ghost people bring bread and salt to a new bathroom and burry a black chicken under the brink.
The Aces, jokers, extra card and box can be seen at page 2.